SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

TANG Memo on Bush
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
You GottaBeKidding
Rear Admiral


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Retyped memos using MS Word. Here are the links.

The two memos without the address at the top are typed with Word's standard 1.25" left and right margins.

The other two use .9" left and right margins. Standard tab settings positioned everything properly except "Suspension" in the second subject line. Had to use four spaces for that. I've seen that done a lot so that doesn't necessarily make me suspicous of anything.

http://members.cox.net/coltie/BushMemo04May72.pdf

http://members.cox.net/coltie/BushMemo19May72.pdf

http://members.cox.net/coltie/BushMemo01Aug72.pdf

http://members.cox.net/coltie/BushMemo18Aug73.pdf

Please look them over and compare them to the original PDFs. If you see any discrepancies, please let me know.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
You GottaBeKidding
Rear Admiral


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ASPB,

I surely want to know who "found" these documents and turned them over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kmmpatriot
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You GottaBeKidding wrote:
ASPB,

Give me a few minutes and I'll post the other three documents as I typed them. People can go over them with a fine-toothed comb. I would appreciate any input.

BTW, why the 1973 document? Does that make any sense at all?

Could it be that it's supposed to be 1972 but there's a typo? Or would it really be 1973?


The OETR referred to in the 18 8Aug 73 memo is likely the one from May of 73 - so the date would have to be later than that in order for the "backdate" to make sense...so I am assuming the idea is that this was written in Aug 73 and then subsequent to that the May 73 OETR was completed and backdated to May...as least this is what I think they are trying to say....

~Kylie
_________________
The Wise man draws more Advantage from his Enemies, than the Fool from his Friends. - from Poor Richard's Almanac...and a perfect commentary on the current state of this campaign!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gulf1609
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Look at this document. Number 6. It says based on VERBAL ORDERS about suspension. No written orders were made! Why is this funny document coming out now when the already released document says the same thing but also says , "preclude the publication of competent written orders"?

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/grounded.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
debinNC
Ensign


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More discussion/info here:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gulf1609
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is a better site to link to the Bush files that have previously been released. President Bush's military records--

http://www.usatoday.com/news/2004-02-14-bush-docs.htm

President Bush released his Vietnam-era military records Friday to counter Democrats' suggestions that he shirked his duty in the Texas Air National Guard. These documents detail Bush's service in the Guard from 1968 until 1973. Bush's medical records were opened for examination by reporters in the Roosevelt Room, but those documents were not allowed to leave the room and are not included below.

PDF (Portable Document Format) requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

1. Enlistment Packet (1.02 MB)
2. Discharge (193 K)
3. Grade Determination (1.54 MB)
4. Performance Grades (449 K)
5. Performance Points (787 K)
6. Reassignments Split Training (224 K)
7. Security Clearance (227 K)
8. School Training (490 K)
9. Miscellaneous (674 K)

2000 Personnel files

10. 2000 Personnel file (1.32 MB)
11. 2000 Personnel file (1.21 MB)
12. 2000 Personnel file (882 K)
13. 2000 Personnel file (841 K)
14. 2000 Personnel file (899 K)

2004 Personnel files

15. 2004 Personnel file (1.20 MB)
16. 2004 Personnel file (1.56 MB)
17. 2004 Personnel file (946 K)
18. 2004 Personnel file (662 K)
19. 2004 Personnel file (821 K)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a note: Ben Barnes daugher, Amy who lives in Denton, Texas is on the radio right now with Monica Crowley (sitting in for Mark Davis on our local radio 820 show) and she just said that herf father is a a political opportunist. Whoa!

She said she loves her father but she knows he is doing this for purely political reasons and that she knows that he never used any influence to get Busn into the National Guard. She also says that he has a book coming out and that is the reason he went on TV. Watch for flying feathers on this.
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truthhunter
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 06 Sep 2004
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:34 pm    Post subject: Any word from FOX or Drudge? Reply with quote

Has anyone received any updates from FOX on this issue? Are they going with the story?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Interested
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 37
Location: PA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

this story on CNN.com has an AP tagline.... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
You GottaBeKidding
Rear Admiral


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what story? where's the link?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ASPB
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1680

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's already all over the net based upon my post to Powerline! Check it out. F... the old media!
_________________
On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tom Poole
Vice Admiral


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 914
Location: America

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:44 pm    Post subject: TANG memo... Reply with quote

Has anyone filed charges for fraud? Notified the FBI? Certainly Rather should be the first one FRIED! Anyone else who fueled this election fraud also should be FRIED (in a rhetorical sense)! If the FBI cannot find anyone to fry, they should be FRIED!
_________________
'58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Interested
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 37
Location: PA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You GottaBeKidding wrote:
what story? where's the link?

apologies...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/09/bush.guard.ap/index.html

here's a version with an AP byline "Pete Yost"
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-wh/2004/sep/09/090900791.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TroyS
Ensign


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 53
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe somebody has all ready said this but how come on:
4th May 1972 there is superscript
19th May 1972 there is no superscript but there is spaces
01 August 1972 also no superscript but still has spaces
18 August 1973 there is superscript

So if the typewriter on the 4th of May was capable of typing superscript why on the 19th of May and in August they didn't use it. Did they have a newer version typewriter then stopped using it and used the old one which was unable to type superscript and then in 1973 they began using the new one again. It just doesn't make sense to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rdtf
CNO


Joined: 13 May 2004
Posts: 2209
Location: BUSHville

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ASPB wrote:
It's already all over the net based upon my post to Powerline! Check it out. F... the old media!

Wow! Do you think it was all because of us? Maybe your call to Major Garrett:)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
Page 8 of 67

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group