View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
You GottaBeKidding Rear Admiral
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 692
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
You GottaBeKidding Rear Admiral
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 692
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ASPB,
I surely want to know who "found" these documents and turned them over. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kmmpatriot Lt.Jg.
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 146
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You GottaBeKidding wrote: | ASPB,
Give me a few minutes and I'll post the other three documents as I typed them. People can go over them with a fine-toothed comb. I would appreciate any input.
BTW, why the 1973 document? Does that make any sense at all?
Could it be that it's supposed to be 1972 but there's a typo? Or would it really be 1973? |
The OETR referred to in the 18 8Aug 73 memo is likely the one from May of 73 - so the date would have to be later than that in order for the "backdate" to make sense...so I am assuming the idea is that this was written in Aug 73 and then subsequent to that the May 73 OETR was completed and backdated to May...as least this is what I think they are trying to say....
~Kylie _________________ The Wise man draws more Advantage from his Enemies, than the Fool from his Friends. - from Poor Richard's Almanac...and a perfect commentary on the current state of this campaign! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gulf1609 Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Look at this document. Number 6. It says based on VERBAL ORDERS about suspension. No written orders were made! Why is this funny document coming out now when the already released document says the same thing but also says , "preclude the publication of competent written orders"?
http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/grounded.gif |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
debinNC Ensign
Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Posts: 51
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gulf1609 Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a better site to link to the Bush files that have previously been released. President Bush's military records--
http://www.usatoday.com/news/2004-02-14-bush-docs.htm
President Bush released his Vietnam-era military records Friday to counter Democrats' suggestions that he shirked his duty in the Texas Air National Guard. These documents detail Bush's service in the Guard from 1968 until 1973. Bush's medical records were opened for examination by reporters in the Roosevelt Room, but those documents were not allowed to leave the room and are not included below.
PDF (Portable Document Format) requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.
1. Enlistment Packet (1.02 MB)
2. Discharge (193 K)
3. Grade Determination (1.54 MB)
4. Performance Grades (449 K)
5. Performance Points (787 K)
6. Reassignments Split Training (224 K)
7. Security Clearance (227 K)
8. School Training (490 K)
9. Miscellaneous (674 K)
2000 Personnel files
10. 2000 Personnel file (1.32 MB)
11. 2000 Personnel file (1.21 MB)
12. 2000 Personnel file (882 K)
13. 2000 Personnel file (841 K)
14. 2000 Personnel file (899 K)
2004 Personnel files
15. 2004 Personnel file (1.20 MB)
16. 2004 Personnel file (1.56 MB)
17. 2004 Personnel file (946 K)
18. 2004 Personnel file (662 K)
19. 2004 Personnel file (821 K) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nomorelies Vice Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 977 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just a note: Ben Barnes daugher, Amy who lives in Denton, Texas is on the radio right now with Monica Crowley (sitting in for Mark Davis on our local radio 820 show) and she just said that herf father is a a political opportunist. Whoa!
She said she loves her father but she knows he is doing this for purely political reasons and that she knows that he never used any influence to get Busn into the National Guard. She also says that he has a book coming out and that is the reason he went on TV. Watch for flying feathers on this. _________________ Nomorelies Make a donation HERE |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
truthhunter Seaman Recruit
Joined: 06 Sep 2004 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:34 pm Post subject: Any word from FOX or Drudge? |
|
|
Has anyone received any updates from FOX on this issue? Are they going with the story? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Interested Seaman Recruit
Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 37 Location: PA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
this story on CNN.com has an AP tagline....  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
You GottaBeKidding Rear Admiral
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 692
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what story? where's the link? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ASPB Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 1680
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's already all over the net based upon my post to Powerline! Check it out. F... the old media! _________________
On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Poole Vice Admiral
Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 914 Location: America
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:44 pm Post subject: TANG memo... |
|
|
Has anyone filed charges for fraud? Notified the FBI? Certainly Rather should be the first one FRIED! Anyone else who fueled this election fraud also should be FRIED (in a rhetorical sense)! If the FBI cannot find anyone to fry, they should be FRIED! _________________ '58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Interested Seaman Recruit
Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 37 Location: PA
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TroyS Ensign
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 53 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe somebody has all ready said this but how come on:
4th May 1972 there is superscript
19th May 1972 there is no superscript but there is spaces
01 August 1972 also no superscript but still has spaces
18 August 1973 there is superscript
So if the typewriter on the 4th of May was capable of typing superscript why on the 19th of May and in August they didn't use it. Did they have a newer version typewriter then stopped using it and used the old one which was unable to type superscript and then in 1973 they began using the new one again. It just doesn't make sense to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rdtf CNO
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ASPB wrote: | It's already all over the net based upon my post to Powerline! Check it out. F... the old media! |
Wow! Do you think it was all because of us? Maybe your call to Major Garrett:) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|