|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
noc PO1
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 492 Location: Dublin, CA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 10:52 pm Post subject: Dan Rather To Bush: ‘Answer The Questions’ |
|
|
"With respect: answer the questions," said Dan Rather, the CBS News anchor. He was asking a direct question to President George W. Bush, his re-election campaign and his political allies in the press and on the Web. "We’ve heard what you have to say about the documents and what you’ve said and what your surrogates have said, but for the moment, answer the questions.
"I say that with respect," he added. "They’d be a lot stronger in their campaign if they did do that."
On Tuesday, Sept. 14, Mr. Rather remained steadfast despite a brutal onslaught of criticism from Bush defenders—including Laura Bush—critics and competing news organizations over the authenticity of memos reportedly typed by Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, Mr. Bush’s squadron commander in the early 1970’s, which suggested that Killian felt pressure from his superior to "sugarcoat" negative evaluations of the future President’s performance.
Since 60 Minutes reported on those documents on Wednesday, Sept. 8, their veracity has been assaulted by Web critics, politicians and document experts who put the burden of proof on Mr. Rather, his producers and on CBS News, and say that the reputation of the news organization is at stake.
Mr. Rather asserted that the lack of denial was itself evidence of the essential truth of his findings. The questions raised by his reporting, he said, have remained unanswered by the Bush administration: Did Mr. Bush get preferential treatment for the Texas Air National Guard? Was then-Lieutenant Bush suspended for failing to perform up to Texas and Air Guard standards? Did then-Lieutenant Bush refuse a direct order from his military superior to take a required examination?
"It’s never been fully, completely denied by the Bush-Cheney campaign or even the White House that he was suspended for meeting the standards of the Air Force or that he didn’t show up for a physical," he said. "The longer we go without a denial of such things—this story is true."
continued...
http://nyobserver.com/pages/frontpage1.asp
in other words, help me i'm sinking |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ArmybratNavywife Ensign
Joined: 12 Sep 2004 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bwahahahahahahahahahaha.
He hasn't denied being Santa Claus either! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rekcutt Ensign
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 68 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:07 pm Post subject: see BS |
|
|
Well, get ready for Congressional hearings very shortly. SeeBS will soon find that the only Constitutional protection permitted is the 5th Amendment, and as Martha discovered perjury is a punishable crime. . . .
Should be a wild and wooly October, might even make Nov/Dec 2000 look tame by comparision.
rek _________________ SwiftVets, keep up the GREAT work, truth will win out over spin. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dmackto Rear Admiral
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 719 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ArmybratNavywife wrote: | bwahahahahahahahahahaha.
He hasn't denied being Santa Claus either! |
That is the exact answer the Bush people should give, if they give any at all. _________________ Deborah
The FROZEN CHICKEN Journal
This is no time for ease and comfort. It is the time to dare and endure.
- Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
W.P. Wily Lt.Jg.
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 101
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:13 pm Post subject: Re: Dan Rather To Bush: ‘Answer The Questions’ |
|
|
noc wrote: | "With respect: answer the questions," said Dan Rather, the CBS News anchor. He was asking a direct question to President George W. Bush, his re-election campaign and his political allies in the press and on the Web. "We’ve heard what you have to say about the documents and what you’ve said and what your surrogates have said, but for the moment, answer the questions.
"I say that with respect," he added. "They’d be a lot stronger in their campaign if they did do that." |
Rather should be saying this to Kerry about the SBVfT questions, there's much more proof than couple of fake memos and an old lady in that story. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you believe the ARROGANCE of this man ???? Me thinks you have far more serious questions to answer Mr. Rather! Maybe you will answer them when you are charged with "fraud with intent to influence an election." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cipher Vice Admiral
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fraud?
That's a bit like calling the memos a HOAX instead of FORGERY.
Treason is the word you are looking for. _________________ USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cipher Vice Admiral
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That defense is roughly equivilant to going to the US Treasury department with a mimeograph copy of a $1000.00 bill.
"It doesn't matter that what's on the paper. I don't care that it's the wrong ink, on the wrong paper, with the wrong printing process, and was never minted by the treasury. It says it's a thousand dollars, just gimme change!"
I wonder how amusing a judge would find that defense? _________________ USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dusty Admiral
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 1264 Location: East Texas
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rather and Kerrry. Future cellmates?
A lot to hope for I know but I'm hoping none the less.
Dusty |
|
Back to top |
|
|
azpatriot Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 593 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2004 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dusty wrote: | Rather and Kerrry. Future cellmates?
A lot to hope for I know but I'm hoping none the less.
Dusty |
Can you imagine the arguments ....... DAN! I didn't say post the damb things on your website! _________________ Proud to be an American! and member of the PAJAMAHADEEN
FedEx Kinko's: When it absolutely, positively has to be forged overnight |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dimsdale Captain
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 527 Location: Massachusetts: the belly of the beast
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
NYtimes today: CBS documents "fake but accurate."
What the hell is that?
I have this fake 10 dollar bill, but it is an accurate dollar because the "10" is not an "11"????????????????? _________________ Everytime he had a choice, Kerry chose to side with communists rather than the United States. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Poole Vice Admiral
Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 914 Location: America
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:16 am Post subject: ...Rather... |
|
|
Dan Rather wrote: | "With respect: answer the questions," said Dan Rather, the CBS News anchor. He was asking a direct question to President George W. Bush, his re-election campaign and his political allies in the press and on the Web. "We’ve heard what you have to say about the documents and what you’ve said and what your surrogates have said, but for the moment, answer the questions.... |
With respect, nobody answers questions from a liar. Why would he, or any American, give you any respect when you stomped him with the ULTIMATE DISRESPECT. Why don't you just slink away. You're irrelevant now. And, take CBS and Juan Williams with you. [added by edit] On the Factor tonight (ugh), Juan Williams, attempting to DEFEND Rather, cast another smear on Larry Thurlow. Somebody ought to vet Juan. _________________ '58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cipher Vice Admiral
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
It would be interesting if the White House yanked all the CBS press credentials and told them that they are only issued to legimate news organizations....
I can hear the squealing now. They would be louder than Helen Thomas..... _________________ USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tom Poole Vice Admiral
Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 914 Location: America
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:28 am Post subject: ...Rather... |
|
|
cipher wrote: | ...yanked all the CBS press credentials... |
Wonderful idea. We all need to write our congressmen. BTW, I just heard on the Factor that CBS did this to Gen Westmoreland in 1982. I was aware of the smear in 1988 using non Vietnam vets to confirm the trauma. But this is the first I've heard of the Westmoreland tale. Anyone know who led the charge? Was it Rather? _________________ '58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lrb111 Captain
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Posts: 508
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:09 am Post subject: Re: ...Rather... |
|
|
Tom Poole wrote: | cipher wrote: | ...yanked all the CBS press credentials... |
Wonderful idea. We all need to write our congressmen. BTW, I just heard on the Factor that CBS did this to Gen Westmoreland in 1982. I was aware of the smear in 1988 using non Vietnam vets to confirm the trauma. But this is the first I've heard of the Westmoreland tale. Anyone know who led the charge? Was it Rather? |
Tom here's a link to a book about it. http://tinyurl.com/5amey
Here was my Google http://tinyurl.com/53cn9
good find
http://www.clemson.edu/caah/history/FacultyPages/EdMoise/ob.html _________________ said Democratic Chairman Terry McAuliffe. "It is inexcusable to mock service and sacrifice."
well, when even the DNC can see it,,,,, then kerry is toast. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|